An open letter to my fellow
conservative Christians (and anyone else who cares to listen in,
because you never know when those strange evangelicals are going to
do something entertaining):
Today's topic makes me angry. I've
thought about it for a long time, especially because I am attempting
to bring up three young women to be as normal as it gets around here.
Another young woman's blog post this morning put me over the edge
just enough to rant about (um, discuss) it today. You definitely
should read her post. http://www.bookwormbeauty.com/2013/05/the-only-thing-my-double-ds-ever-got-me.html?spref=fb
I write about fears here, big and
small, imagined and otherwise. But one I truly hate both because of
the damage it does and the lies it tells, is the prevalence of shame
young women get about their bodies. It happens everywhere. But when
it happens in church, it's a straight up lie about God and the beauty
of his creation.
I've read these ideas in Christian
books, heard them on talk shows, and listened to them from youth
leaders. And they are lies.
“Oh honey, guys just can't help
themselves. You've got to make sure you don't provoke them.”
“Don't make these young men sin by
the way you look.”
“If boys think you're a certain kind
of girl because of the way you dress, don't blame them for what
happens.”
Why has the church embraced the idea
that, in every other area of life people make their own choices and
are responsible for their own mistakes, but in the arena of
sexuality, boys will be boys? And girls must, therefore, be ashamed
of being girls.
Girls, therefore, end up with intense
guilt over simply being female. At an age where they can't possibly
understand it and are trying to come to terms with their own
confusing maturity, they're told what they're becoming is an
embarrassment to God. Nothing is so untrue. God created woman and
said his work was very good. There was nothing to add or to hide.
We've done that.
Women, of any age, should not have to
fear their own bodies, nor other peoples' reactions to them. Period.
That's God's assessment of his creation, not my opinion.
No girl should have to dress in baggy
sweats because she is afraid of condemnation or starve herself
because she is afraid she's not good enough or stuff herself because
she's afraid of attracting unwanted attention. Young women, if you're
doing any of those and no one has told you yet, the way others react
to your body is a reflection of them, not you.
I am not suggesting ladies saunter into
church (or anywhere) wearing off-the-rack-Beyonce and expect to be
put in charge of youth group. Covering yourself is respectful to
everyone, yourself most of all. (Guys, we're talking to you too,
here. You have no idea how many times Ive stood in a line and wanted
to tap the guy in front of me on the shoulder and ask, “So, are
those pants on their way up or down? Because either way, they haven't
made it, and the indecision has got to be killing them.”) Yes,
girls, putting it all out there for public view does send a message,
just not the one you're told. It says, “I have zero self-respect.”
Which is another topic.
But there's a difference between
modesty and internalizing the message of shame over a normal, healthy
body. We, good church people, have done the latter too much.
Plus, guys, are you not also angry? I
have to wonder, do you not feel frustrated at being labeled nothing
but a bunch or hormones with no self-control? Should you not be at
the forefront of this argument, asserting that you are, in fact,
fully functional human beings with brains and judgment? That you do
not live at the constant whim of your, um, male parts, and nothing
else? And, if you are a male pastor, writer, or youth leader, should
you not be saying this?
Yes, you should. And as a female
pastor, I just did. Let the comments fall where they may. I have
three girls to raise with self-respect. Please don't lie to them
anymore.















